<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Running Harder than Biking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/2007/02/is-running-harder-than-biking.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/2007/02/is-running-harder-than-biking.html</link>
	<description>A way to keep in touch with family and friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JDS</title>
		<link>http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/2007/02/is-running-harder-than-biking.html/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>JDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/is-running-harder-than-biking.html#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I think Lance&#039;s comment makes most sense when you consider it from his angle. The body is remarkably adaptable to your habitual activities. In this case, if you ride your bicycle 120 miles a day, eventually, you should be pretty good at it. But that riding would only apply to running from a cardiovascular standpoint. Mechanically, it wouldn&#039;t be much help at all due to the difference in the movements. As a long time cyclist (and racer), I can easily attest to this! When I was riding the most (say, 16+- hours of cycling per week), I thought I was in fantastic shape. But if I went on a hike that previously would have been no problem for me, I would be sore the next day. If I ran, it would be even worse. So, overall, your body is good at what you train it to do. Unfortunately, most folks train it to sit....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Lance&#8217;s comment makes most sense when you consider it from his angle. The body is remarkably adaptable to your habitual activities. In this case, if you ride your bicycle 120 miles a day, eventually, you should be pretty good at it. But that riding would only apply to running from a cardiovascular standpoint. Mechanically, it wouldn&#8217;t be much help at all due to the difference in the movements. As a long time cyclist (and racer), I can easily attest to this! When I was riding the most (say, 16+- hours of cycling per week), I thought I was in fantastic shape. But if I went on a hike that previously would have been no problem for me, I would be sore the next day. If I ran, it would be even worse. So, overall, your body is good at what you train it to do. Unfortunately, most folks train it to sit&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/2007/02/is-running-harder-than-biking.html/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/is-running-harder-than-biking.html#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I want to get back into running (as always). For the next two months or so I have an intense time for school. But I really want to run again. There are some great mountain runs near the University of Utah, so maybe I will do that after school. Or maybe bike to and from school. What I would really love to do is a triathlon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to get back into running (as always). For the next two months or so I have an intense time for school. But I really want to run again. There are some great mountain runs near the University of Utah, so maybe I will do that after school. Or maybe bike to and from school. What I would really love to do is a triathlon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/2007/02/is-running-harder-than-biking.html/comment-page-1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/is-running-harder-than-biking.html#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I really wish I was stronger on the bike, but I personally find it easier for me to run up a hill than bike.  I have ran 3 marathons and they are difficult, I was rather surprised when Lance said it was the most difficult thing he has ever done.  I still think the Tour de France is much more grueling than running a marathon.  Are you going to run anymore marathons Pic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish I was stronger on the bike, but I personally find it easier for me to run up a hill than bike.  I have ran 3 marathons and they are difficult, I was rather surprised when Lance said it was the most difficult thing he has ever done.  I still think the Tour de France is much more grueling than running a marathon.  Are you going to run anymore marathons Pic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/2007/02/is-running-harder-than-biking.html/comment-page-1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/is-running-harder-than-biking.html#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Running is way harder than biking.  When you run, your whole body is involved: legs, arms, torso, everything, and the pounding of your feet starts to take a toll.  Biking is easy.  Around, and around, and around, mostly just calf and thigh muscles.  I love the burn in my thighs after biking up a huge hill, but it certainly doesn&#039;t compare to the breathlessness after running up a really steep hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running is way harder than biking.  When you run, your whole body is involved: legs, arms, torso, everything, and the pounding of your feet starts to take a toll.  Biking is easy.  Around, and around, and around, mostly just calf and thigh muscles.  I love the burn in my thighs after biking up a huge hill, but it certainly doesn&#8217;t compare to the breathlessness after running up a really steep hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul</title>
		<link>http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/2007/02/is-running-harder-than-biking.html/comment-page-1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Saul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevepiccolo.hammerpig.com/is-running-harder-than-biking.html#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Well running is just not as much fun as biking, hence the &lt;b&gt;PAIN&lt;/b&gt;.  Being able to put in 100 miles in one day is nice and all, but I can bike a marathon any day of the week, and not be all that tired...hence, even though running is harder, biking is way more fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well running is just not as much fun as biking, hence the <b>PAIN</b>.  Being able to put in 100 miles in one day is nice and all, but I can bike a marathon any day of the week, and not be all that tired&#8230;hence, even though running is harder, biking is way more fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

